Please, don't take these automated tools too seriously. They rely on outdated information and by their nature require the formation of rules and guidelines that really don't exist.
There is some value from a technical perspective, if they catch coding errors, but there is really no substitute for a trained human eye.
Thanks Ryan . Should have done a search first and bumped the thread. Forgot it was posted already. Memory seems to be going a bit and I even partcipated in the thread