In his speech at SAF - he brought out a tidbit.
He ordered two dozen Vera Wang roses for his wife, was shocked when they came to him in 2 boxes.
Said he called Mike Soenen and asked WTF is this?
He was told he should have noticed the little florist delivery clock, or absense thereof, that went to the disclaimer.
Said they were dressed up to go out to dinner and had to stop and find a vase and do all this cutting and stuff.
So one thing some of us will take as rather good news is that he plans to make items like this clearly labeled and not deceptive, as he knew first hand what a turn off it was. I'm only guessing imagery would reflect that.
Now I asked him myself if there would be less of a prevalence of drop ship vs florist delivered on their site, and he seemed surprised that there was. And that this was a major b*tch we have as florists. That the way it is ramped up then all of a sudden dropped on florists, overloading them at last minute, leads to a huge quality issue. They have the data and know when they exceed capacity, yet they choose to do it anyway, and their quality scores reflect this.
From his reaction - I actually think he hadn't noticed that.
I know some here profess they don't care about quality::BS, and will find a way to discount this - go for it, knock yourself out.
On another side note - I spoke to "the Architect" of the Delayed Response program and gave my input again that I felt an ASK should stop the clock to start it again when the ANS is sent. Senders need to be held to the same timely response standards as fillers.
He said they have that capability now, already built into the software, but have chosen not to flip that switch because they fear they will get back and forths all day.
I had the feeling that if enough people told them that would be a good idea - it could possibly get that switch filipped.
Rock on
He ordered two dozen Vera Wang roses for his wife, was shocked when they came to him in 2 boxes.
Said he called Mike Soenen and asked WTF is this?
He was told he should have noticed the little florist delivery clock, or absense thereof, that went to the disclaimer.
Said they were dressed up to go out to dinner and had to stop and find a vase and do all this cutting and stuff.
So one thing some of us will take as rather good news is that he plans to make items like this clearly labeled and not deceptive, as he knew first hand what a turn off it was. I'm only guessing imagery would reflect that.
Now I asked him myself if there would be less of a prevalence of drop ship vs florist delivered on their site, and he seemed surprised that there was. And that this was a major b*tch we have as florists. That the way it is ramped up then all of a sudden dropped on florists, overloading them at last minute, leads to a huge quality issue. They have the data and know when they exceed capacity, yet they choose to do it anyway, and their quality scores reflect this.
From his reaction - I actually think he hadn't noticed that.
I know some here profess they don't care about quality::BS, and will find a way to discount this - go for it, knock yourself out.
On another side note - I spoke to "the Architect" of the Delayed Response program and gave my input again that I felt an ASK should stop the clock to start it again when the ANS is sent. Senders need to be held to the same timely response standards as fillers.
He said they have that capability now, already built into the software, but have chosen not to flip that switch because they fear they will get back and forths all day.
I had the feeling that if enough people told them that would be a good idea - it could possibly get that switch filipped.
Rock on