Problems with Main Forum...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Control Freak

Infinite said:
It has to do with George posting through Allison's account.

Ryan


You mean my being restricted is intentional? Because George accidentally posted in my office while I was logged on? Even after he acknowledged the error 5 minutes after the fact? Even though his reply under my name was VERY clear it was George speaking?
And even though the error remained IN the flowerSoft forum?

Wow, Ryan...You have given new meaning to the wordsCONTROL FREAK!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
allison mauro said:
You mean my being restricted is intentional? Because George accidentally posted in my office while I was logged on? Even after he acknowledged the error 5 minutes after the fact? Even though his reply under my name was VERY clear it was George speaking?
And even though the error remained IN the flowerSoft forum?

Wow, Ryan...You have given new meaning to the wordsCONTROL FREAK!!!


Allison... this board is Ryan's. We are all here because he generously provides the forum. He gets to make the rules and we can choose to respect them and the other memebers, or go elsewhere to play.

V
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Victoria said:
Allison... this board is Ryan's. We are all here because he generously provides the forum. He gets to make the rules and we can choose to respect them and the other memebers, or go elsewhere to play.

V

That's fine with me, just hope you don't say anything Ryan doesn't agree with, V or he'll censor you as well.

As far as I'm concerned, Ryan is a joke of a host.

The ONLY reason he censored flowerSoft was to better position himself and his new 'job' :)))))))
 
I guess you haven't met Ryan in person

Because he would not do what oyu are claiming of. Ryan is straight forward, nice guy. He is not scare of any competition between Mass and flower soft and any other POS System. If he control that then All of those post that had Flower soft, Mass, Daisy, advantage RTI etc etc would have been deleted.

I personally know Ryan and he is one of the nicest person this earth has.
I truly believe you owe him a apology and I hope your coment is considered as part of a bad day.
Luc
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Luc said:
Because he would not do what oyu are claiming of. Ryan is straight forward, nice guy. He is not scare of any competition between Mass and flower soft and any other POS System. If he control that then All of those post that had Flower soft, Mass, Daisy, advantage RTI etc etc would have been deleted.

I personally know Ryan and he is one of the nicest person this earth has.
I truly believe you owe him a apology and I hope your coment is considered as part of a bad day.
Luc

My comment is the result of Ryan's censorship on this board. Something he so opposed of the floristboard he has now become...a man with no integrity and absolutely no reason to play around with his little adminstrator controls :) he's a joke...

If you and the rest of the members want to pussy-foot around Ryan because he 'provides' this forum, go right ahead.

I honestly don't know why George would want an explanation from Ryan, George can buy and sell Ryan ten times over...
 
Well well well... I have my very first "red" dot... and I didn't call anyone any names. ;)

Thank you to the anon. donor.

V
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Allison...

NO ONE "pussyfoots" around Ryan...there is NO NEED!
Luc said he is nice, and that is true, HOWEVER, Ryan has given a very large latitude to everyone, and in time, each poster has to "bear" the reputation of the FlowerChat Nation with an unspoken "honour code" and just like ANYWHERE ELSE, each poster is responsible for their actions, and opinions, BUT, when there is ANY sign of an "escalating" level of derogatory behaviour, THIS is NOT the place to challenge the rules...we KNOW the rules of engagement here, and IF someone posts under MY account, it is MY PROBLEM...and in THIS CASE, it's YOUR PROBLEM!!
Each poster here has software pos system favourites, and comparison is what this is all about....this is NOT a dog fight site, and will NEVER BE!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
allison mauro said:
My comment is the result of Ryan's censorship on this board. Something he so opposed of the floristboard he has now become...a man with no integrity and absolutely no reason to play around with his little adminstrator controls :) he's a joke...

If you and the rest of the members want to pussy-foot around Ryan because he 'provides' this forum, go right ahead.

I honestly don't know why George would want an explanation from Ryan, George can buy and sell Ryan ten times over...

Uhh, lets just let things cool off a bit. Ryan is not trying to better position himself using the board. How would that work anyway? Banning all discussion on other technology would not look good. Just chill for a while and then ask nicely to have the retrictions removed. It just might work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Mikey the Flower Guy said:
NO ONE "pussyfoots" around Ryan...there is NO NEED!
Luc said he is nice, and that is true, HOWEVER, Ryan has given a very large latitude to everyone, and in time, each poster has to "bear" the reputation of the FlowerChat Nation with an unspoken "honour code" and just like ANYWHERE ELSE, each poster is responsible for their actions, and opinions, BUT, when there is ANY sign of an "escalating" level of derogatory behaviour, THIS is NOT the place to challenge the rules...we KNOW the rules of engagement here, and IF someone posts under MY account, it is MY PROBLEM...and in THIS CASE, it's YOUR PROBLEM!!
Each poster here has software pos system favourites, and comparison is what this is all about....this is NOT a dog fight site, and will NEVER BE!!

I don't have a 'problem'...
my only 'concern' was that Ryan felt he is 'exempt' from explaining why he censored George, a long time member, for no apparent reason. And if you don't care what my concerns are, read posts from other 'members' here asking Ryan the same question. He uses the 'cop out' of he doesn't have to explain himself... because he does NOT have an explanation..

All the posts I keep reading for explanations are:
"It's Ryan's board" "Ryan Pays" who cares.
 
K A Hall said:
Uhh, lets just let things cool off a bit. Ryan is not trying to better position himself using the board. How would that work anyway? Banning all discussion on other technology would not look good. Just chill for a while and then ask nicely to have the retrictions removed. It just might work.

How do you know that Ryan is not trying to better position himself? Why would he change the order of the technology forum, where flowerSoft was first and put MAS first and flowerSoft on the bottom?

Ryan is the one who ask flowerSoft to start a flowerSoft forum to HELP create interest in HIS board. And now that he has a new job with MAS he has a different attitude. I can't say I blame him, he has his work cut out for him :) :) :)
 
allison mauro said:
How do you know that Ryan is not trying to better position himself? Why would he change the order of the technology forum, where flowerSoft was first and put MAS first and flowerSoft on the bottom?

Ryan is the one who ask flowerSoft to start a flowerSoft forum to HELP create interest in HIS board. And now that he has a new job with MAS he has a different attitude. I can't say I blame him, he has his work cut out for him :) :) :)

Ok, I know longer care about any of this. What a bunch of big babies.
 
I will respond to one persistent lie:

I never asked FlowerSoft to come here. George came and started advertising from the minute he got here. I had to create the FlowerSoft forum because his posts were dominating all the other threads.

FlowerSoft is welcome here, and always has been, but you were never specially invited, and we did not need your help to build FlowerChat any more than we needed every other of the 400 members here.

Ryan
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
All these recent posts by FS people are again very counter productive, including the "planted" MAS bashing post on floristboard, which was like TOO TOO obvious, guys. One would think a company who has eye to the future would maintain a bit more professional decorum than I hear recently.

After DOMINATING this board since its inception, it's just a darn shame that it would go from the flowersoft board to more of a MAS supporting board. This sounds a bit like Peter Plumley who openly showed his jealousy of success, after hammering us over and over and over again to join him, and when we didn't, well...sour grapes abounded, didn't they? People all looked at Peter's product, chose something bigger and better, hmmm, and he got M-A-D. Became a case of enuf is enuf. Familiar?

Ryan's tolerance with this situation including personal attacks is admirable, and with each renewed one, you just put more egg on your own face.

Yet it's kind of amusing to watch...so keep it up.

By the way, MAS rocks, nothing "Soft" about it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
zzzzzzzzz.....

bloomz said:
All these recent posts by FS people are again very counter productive, including the "planted" MAS bashing post on floristboard, which was like TOO TOO obvious, guys. One would think a company who has eye to the future would maintain a bit more professional decorum than I hear recently.

After DOMINATING this board since its inception, it's just a darn shame that it would go from the flowersoft board to more of a MAS supporting board. This sounds a bit like Peter Plumley who openly showed his jealousy of success, after hammering us over and over and over again to join him, and when we didn't, well...sour grapes abounded, didn't they? People all looked at Peter's product, chose something bigger and better, hmmm, and he got M-A-D. Became a case of enuf is enuf. Familiar?

Ryan's tolerance with this situation including personal attacks is admirable, and with each renewed one, you just put more egg on your own face.

Yet it's kind of amusing to watch...so keep it up.

By the way, MAS rocks, nothing "Soft" about it!


Nah, I'm bored with you guys now...

Yes, MAS rocks :) all 35 of ya!!! :) :) :)
 
:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • egg.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 35
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Status
Not open for further replies.