Originally posted by flowerknife+us
If you have a paid site, one recieves the service fee of 9.95. Less the 1.95 fee they charge for handling the order. Netting you 8$. Should be sufficent to cover the cost of del. All at 100$ dollars.
If not a paid site then I guess you may have an issue. But then your not havine the order beat for 27% either. On a 50$ order, that still represents a difference of 13.50$.
Nothings free... or perfect... Sometimes only a little better.
I knew the "Well at least it isn't at 27%" thing would come up.
That is just a cop out answer. Sorry but if they say we get the orders at 100% they should be at 100%.
But the big thing again is. What about all of the florists independent websites that have the orders priced with delivery. And then flower buyers see that well Teleflora.com is cheaper. there goes that florists order.
And guess what? Even the websites that Teleflora sets up with their florists has $5 added to the SRP to cover delivery automaticly. Hmmm, strange that they would do something to actuallt UNDERCUT their own florist's sites.
They are taking a piece of the pie no matter how it is spun.
Just take a look at the new Teleflora Co-op ads.
There is a big
www.teleflora.com banner across the whole bottom. So ABC florist buys a co-op ad. One of ABC florists customers sees the ad and wants that item. The customer see's ABC florist's website and looks at the item $50. Hmm then looks at Teleflora.com and sees $44.95. Well it is cheaper at Teleflora.com so the customer gets it there. Not only does the customer get it there they also just pick the reccomended florist, a florist that NEVER EVEN HAD A CO-OP ad.
Thanks, Teleflora now florists that didn't even buy a co-op ad have a chance of getting that order from the people that did advertise.
Not asking for free...just asking for fair.
Is it fair to ask someone to deliver something without a delivery charge?