USA recommends consumers look at retail and then shop on-line or do it yourself

Simon, thanks for that. I assume you went to the USA Today article being referenced?

Here is a link to that.

I didn't read word for word every comment made on the USA Today article, there are at the moment 46 of them.

One comment though said almost all that needed to be said. Here it is in it's entirety.

I have no issue however, with online retailing, even discount retailing online. If you're willing to do the research yourself what you want and take the risk of ordering something sight unseen, you can get a discount for it. This seems reasonable considering the investment of time and the increased risk needed to do so.

What I do find absolutely morally reprehensible is to come into my store and ask for advice, have me show you around the store, look and feel and touch everything, make an informed decision, snap a picture of the scan code and buy it on Amazon on your smart phone on the way out the door. The number of times people have said "well it's cheaper online, why is that? I'll just buy it there".

Why? Because I pay high rate retail rents to another local business family who's business is to own a shopping center. Because my business has a beautiful store with fixtures and play-tables for your kids to play on and music and fun. Because my business hires local people and pays them to take you around the store and show you things for a 1/2 hour (at the CA minimum wage, that 1/2 hour costs $4). Because my business pays local taxes. Because my business sponsored your son's little league team. Because my business gave a gift certificate to your daughter's dance fundraiser. Because if you tell me which elementary school you go to, I give 5% of what you spent right back to your childrens' school. And you're complaining you can get it cheaper online?

If you don't like this service I provide, don't use it. If you feel that all of this is frivolous and you'd prefer lower prices to good customer service, easy returns, and a wonderful environment? That's fine with me. That's your decision.

But don't come in here, take advantage of me, and then buy it online. You're sneaking into the theater without paying (justifying, well I didn't really STEAL anything). You're killing your local economy. Shame on you and SHAME on USA Today.

Several comments referenced boycotting USA Today advertisers. I cannot help but wonder if those same advertisers who have brick and mortar shops were pleased to have their advertising dollars used to pay this writer.

The thinking behind this article is, I'm afraid, abundant in our newest form of society. I can only be grateful that if somebody comes into my shop and snaps a picture of a design in my cooler, chances are the only place they will be able to purchase that same exact model is.....well.....on my website.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHR and KABERS
Simon, thanks for that.
The thinking behind this article is, I'm afraid, abundant in our newest form of society. I can only be grateful that if somebody comes into my shop and snaps a picture of a design in my cooler, chances are the only place they will be able to purchase that same exact model is.....well.....on my website.

I've watched this "backfire" on customers, and when they come in, I just start giggling, and ignore them...I've had a couple complain that I was "rude"......you BETCHA!!
 
I love how the person you quoted Linda, makes mention to all of the things a local business does for the community. I have yet to see Amazon, eBay, or the likes donate to a local cause. Try calling them and saying, "I've been a customer for years, would you like to donate to our local church auction." After they stopped laughing I'm sure they would hang up.
 
Linda,

I read the Blog & its' comments and the USA Today article and the comments there.

I particularly enjoyed the comment on USA Today that suggested someone take all their papers from a street side roadstand having paid for just one.

What is annoying is the way papers - of all sizes - write fluff pieces, usually from the PR company for a large/national/global company, extolling the virtue of their products - makes me think how 1-800, TF and FTD drone on about how wonderful THEIR (?) designs are and really have nothing to do with the over-whelming majority of the product that leaves a member florist. When we try to get paper coverage it's akin to making coherent contact with some-one at a WS - well nigh impossible.