Joe Mioux
Well-Known Member
Actually they can't because many of the costs are tied to membership fees and miscellaneous charges you pay whether you receive the order or you reject it.
...but you already knew that.
RC
Actually they (we) can.
Actually they can't because many of the costs are tied to membership fees and miscellaneous charges you pay whether you receive the order or you reject it.
...but you already knew that.
RC
Actually they can't because many of the costs are tied to membership fees and miscellaneous charges you pay whether you receive the order or you reject it.
...but you already knew that.
RC
Joe,
The commission rates are determined by the supply and demand of / for orders.
Because there are so many florists who want incoming orders, there is a high price to be paid for those orders. (20% + 7% + fees)
But then ... you already knew that.
If we look at the whole WS industries, the number of wire-ins and wire-outs must necessarily be the same.
If we just look at the retail-florist sector, the number of wire-ins must necessarily be greater than that of wire-outs, because of the existence of sending-only companies.
So, if there is no sending-only companies (a scenario which I know won't happen), the ratio of wire-ins vs wire-outs among retail florists will become close to 50:50, if we look at a large enough pool (say all the florists in Long Island). Of course, if we are just looking at a single shop, the numbers won't always be equal.
The desperate demand has been going on long before the days of rebates or order gathering.I agree to a degree. On the other hand, I think the desperate "demand" for incoming orders by small florists is the consequence, rather than the cause, for rampant Order Gathering by WS's.
A long time ago in this forum, I proposed a system of flexible commission split. At that time, no one responded, but I can repeat it here.
Instead of a fixed split, like 80-20, why not make the split a kind of bidding system? If your shop is so desparate for orders, you bid, say, 30% commission for incoming orders. A central computer automatically route an order to the higest bidder.
For a small town, this system won't work for obvious reasons. But for a large city with many potential fillers, it could work. Let the market decide the equilibrium point for commission split.
Sorry, but this thread is at best a pipedream. The WS need orders to keep the system going. They are not going to take actions that will reduce the flow of orders. It just isn't going to happen.
Let's say Teleflora changed to a 90/10 split tomorrow. For the first week the fillers would be happy as clams. The next week the people bringing in the orders (OGs) would start sending all of their orders through FTD. Then the Teleflora fillers would get a drastically reduced number of orders. This would make them very sad, so they would switch to FTD also.
None of the established wire services would be the first to do this.
Not possible, for the reason mentioned by Bigted.
Mathematically, the actual partition of commissions, whether it's 80-20 or even 50-50, wouldn't make any difference in your gross profit, IF the number of incoming you fill and the number of outgoing you gather were the same. Commission-out and commission-in would cancel out each other.