I agree with RC. The one suffering is the customer.
I had a Bloomnet order a week ago that they actually measured--MEASURED the height!!! I was just under what it was supossed to be (although every @@@@ stem was there, I just cut them an inch too short, basically) per the dimensions on 1800flowers.com and they cancelled the order on me after the customer called in and complained. I fought, and was paid for it, but really, this headache was unnecessary.
Oh--reason they measured the arrangement--- customer paid $64 for arrangement, and, of course, I received $49.99 from which I had to take out delivery.... they (the customer) just does't get that the $14 "Service Fee" isn't delivery. They think it is, so they really think they have paid $64 for the arrangement when in fact they paid $49.99 for the arrangement and delivery, plus just increased 1-800's pocket by $14.
The article was good, and made sense, just not in real life. Not aplicable.
And 10% labor....who does that????? My husband even gawked when he saw that in the article.
I had a Bloomnet order a week ago that they actually measured--MEASURED the height!!! I was just under what it was supossed to be (although every @@@@ stem was there, I just cut them an inch too short, basically) per the dimensions on 1800flowers.com and they cancelled the order on me after the customer called in and complained. I fought, and was paid for it, but really, this headache was unnecessary.
Oh--reason they measured the arrangement--- customer paid $64 for arrangement, and, of course, I received $49.99 from which I had to take out delivery.... they (the customer) just does't get that the $14 "Service Fee" isn't delivery. They think it is, so they really think they have paid $64 for the arrangement when in fact they paid $49.99 for the arrangement and delivery, plus just increased 1-800's pocket by $14.
The article was good, and made sense, just not in real life. Not aplicable.
And 10% labor....who does that????? My husband even gawked when he saw that in the article.