I believe the numbers speak for themselves, the number of florists in North America gets smaller every year. One of the reasons (not the sole one) for that is 50%-60% of flower sales have moved away from the florist. The math is pretty clear.
While I agree that a good portion of a florists business is service and design the reality is the product they sell is still and always will be flowers. Arguments relying on this sort of logic are best reserved for around drinks at a florist convention, in the real world the consumer to a huge degree has spoken. If you don't believe me just stand outside of Costco or a Safeway for an hour at Valentines Day and count the customers coming our carrying roses.roses that used to be sold by florists!
Sorry Doug, but I think your viewpoint is dead wrong, and those that try to run their business around that thought process will not be in business much longer. Suggesting florists product is "flowers" is like saying Jiffy Lube's product is "oil" or McDonald's product is "ground beef". Yes, florists use flowers in their product and the cost of those flowers is passed on to the customer, but the true product of a florist is the design and service. period.
You are correct. Costco sells "flowers". That is their product within the industry. Once upon a time (and occasionally now) a florist will sell "flowers" but that is not what their marketing efforts or survival should focus on. Costco sells flowers, oil, ground beef etc targeting the customer that wants to complete the "service" portion themselves to save money. There will always be those customers, and it would be foolish for a florist to attempt to compete with big box for them. Instead, florists must market the design and service (value) they add to the flowers. This is what the customers are paying for.
Grocery and big box have sold "flowers" for well over 20 years now. This is nothing new. The rapid increase in their market share is largely due to the recession, as is the overall decrease industry wide. Basic economic principles show that during times of economic downturn people cut luxury items completely, or they trade down to cheaper alternatives--hence the reason big box has seen a boom, and is aggressively going after the market. This is not isolated to the floral industry. McDonalds has very successfully taken marketshare from Starbucks for the same economic reasons. The question becomes will the retail florist adjust their business model to retain as many customers as possible (Jamie had some great points on that) and will they be poised to win those customers back as the economy strengthens, or will they simply concede the business to mass and do nothing. In relation to this post, it most likely means dropping the WS model. It is not possible for a florist to pay a WS the amount of fees needed and satisfy the customers budget at the same time. There MUST be change. The florists that do nothing will not survive. You again are correct that there will be a consolidation of florists and the ones that survive will be the strongest. (gotta love Darwin)
The customer has never "spoken" as you suggest. Trends and consumer habits are constantly changing and evolving. The trend today will not be the same as the trend in 3 years or 10 years. EVERY business in EVERY industry, big and small, must evolve and change their business model in order to survive. The key for retail florists is are they willing and ready to evolve and fight for their future? Are they ready to be innovative and show the customer the difference between "flowers" and a "professionally designed floral arrangement" and the value they are getting for their money. Personally, I think any florist that is serious about evolving and remaining competitive needs to stop relying on WS for business, Stop giving away their product (service and design), Market themselves, Bring their business into the digital age, and stop trying to sell "flowers", and sell their product!
The customer had once "spoken" that the Sears catalog was the best shopping method around. They also spoke that Kmart was the best retailer in America. They also spoke that Walmart's "lowest prices" with no service was the best model, now Walmart is desperately trying to reinvent their model as it is failing them miserably. I could go on and on, but ultimately FLORISTS are in the best position to determine how the customer "speaks" tomorrow. Unlike Mass and Grocery, florists have a relationship with their customers. Their encounters with customers are interactive and engaging. FFC has a great opportunity to use this advantage to help determine the future of the industry. Are we as florists going to reinvent ourselves and our business models to be successful in the future (McDonalds, Kroger, Kohls, Clarabella Flowers), or are we going to sit back and let ourselves become irrelavant and go from the top of our industry to the bottom, or out of business (kmart, woolworths, montgomery wards, FTD, TF
You speak of the "florists" as if they are one cohesive group with the same vision, drive, skills, business acumen, and direction. There is nothing that could be further from the truth.
"Florists" in fact consist of thousands of individual businesses all with their own opinions and methods of running their business. Yet somehow you feel this "group" is the only one capable of determining what the consumer wants and how to provide it.
Yowser! You might as well attempt to herd cats. Even trying to form a group of any substance whether it be SAF, AIFD, or FFC is a challenge.
You are speaking about individual entrepreneurs all with their own opinion of what is best to save the industry.
All the companies ( I cant speak personally about Clarabella Flowers although you have included your shop in this group) you use as examples of being successful in their sectors have leadership that makes decisions that ALL locations follow. They also invest heavily in advertising, ongoing renovations, and national and regional marketing. This is not likely to take place at any time amongst mom and pop florists who struggle to meet the rent each month.
And yes the consumer has spoken, intentionally or not, following trends or not, at the end of the day if the consumer has taken his business elsewhere it all has the same net effect. If you don't believe this ask your local butcher (there used to be one every second block), if you can find one.
You refer to "professionally trained floral designers", maybe you can enlighten me as to where this training took place for these these tens of thousands of individuals, what credentials their instructors have, and what standards were followed.
Suggesting that the recession is the reason that supermarkets and big box stores are seeing a bigger share of the consumers flower dollar may well be true. However it does not mean the problem is any less serious, every dollar that leaves the florist is very unlikely to ever come back. The consumer is nothing if not a creature of habit, and with the advantages the supermarkets have (price, convenience, and in many case quality) most will continue to buy flowers there.
All I can say is that if you believe "evolution" is on the florists side, good luck as you may be joining the DoDo bird. I do agree with you that the florist needs to reinvent themselves, something that as an organization our company is continuously attempting to do, however I fear that many florists out there are incapable or at the very least resistant to change. Too many prefer the good old days. In fact FFC original call to action was the classic example, change the WS's. Unfortunately that boat has sailed, as you so aptly pointed out "EVERY business in EVERY industry, big and small, must evolve and change their business model in order to survive.", unfortunately for the florist that is exactly what the WS's have done over the last decade and a half.
None the less I hope that your are one of the ones (along with the vast majority) standing beside us when the dust finally settles.