I would be willing to offer the FH 40% on top of a 10% discounted price for their book. I would even brand it with their name, not mine. Let them sell elevated pricing with their name, and reap the benefits of the orders. They have a great motivation to sell flowers for you, and you have a really nice agreement. It happens in many industries and is win win for both parties.
Those who require a 40% discount just to send you the order are being greedy, and aren't good salespeople. Their sell is relatively easy, so they should treat it accordingly. There is lots of work out there that isn't worth doing, and this would be in that category.
Thanks Duane, this seems reasonable.
But, I think this is the reality.
According to the
FTC Funeral Rules (PDF):
The Funeral Rule requires funeral providers to disclose to you in writing if they charge a
fee for buying cash advance items. Cash advance items are goods or services that are
paid for by the funeral provider on your behalf. Some examples of cash advance items
are flowers, obituary notices, pallbearers, and clergy honoraria. Some funeral providers
charge only their cost for these items. Others add a service fee to their cost.
The
Funeral Rule requires the funeral provider to inform you ahead of time when a service
fee is to be added to the price of cash advance items or if the provider gets a refund,
discount, or rebate from the supplier of any cash advance item.
Not sure if the disclosure is buried in the small print, but I'd sure like to see how SCI complies with this rule.
You can bet that attorneys from other WSs (and from some large florists who will be losing their FH deals) will be looking at how this all plays out.
However the survivors will be the ones that adapt to the changing business environment , not the ones that whine and cry about the forces they perceive as being arrayed against them.
I adapted to changed business practices by quitting WS. I found through good, sound tracking that I would be much better off without them. For some, it works very well. If I were Karen though, I would be LOUDLY proclaiming to ALL area consumers just why she won't be doing the flowers for those funerals anymore. That is why your next statement hits me as a paradox, and also the statement that spurred me into posting.
Although technology has opened Pandora's Box, ultimately it is the consumer making the choice as to where to spend their hard earned money (that has never changed).
Now this I completely DIS-agree with. Here is where my biggest problem lies, and perhaps it is because I am a capitalist pig. The consumer is NOT given a choice in this partnership, unless it is clearly stated to them in their consultation, that they will pay a premium of an additional 40% for the added-value service. I think it is taking advantage of the grief-stricken family.
I would suggest that is the job of the purchaser not the seller. Lets take the case of roses, Costco sells two dozen 50 cm for under $20.00, the average florist would be in the $80-120 range.
So tell me, what is the "value" of 2 dozen 50 cm roses? I would suggest that to consumers buying them at Costco the value is under $20.00. That would also suggest that in the eyes of these Costco consumers that the average florist is changing far more than the "value received".
Here is where we can agree. Of course, I don't sell 50cm roses at $80, I sell a dozen 80cm at $50 in a vase. However, each consumer has their own perceived value. I won't argue that, they are FREE to make their own choices, and probably are not in a weakened state of grief, either.
That is the big difference to me. It is with every confidence that I conjecture the out-come. Those funeral directors will be forced to sell the whole package, and will manipulate a normally strong person into being swayed to a more expensive tribute with less value.
You can say that they won't know the difference and will feel fine with it, but as with a deceitful og, the true fact remains that if the consumer KNOWS they are being charged a HEFTY "service" surcharge, they don't go for it.
Are you honestly saying that if your child died, (in this example "you" are NOT a professional florist), and when you go to make the funeral arrangements the funeral home says they will take care of all of the details for you, just pick from this and that, you wouldn't go for it? But then, you find out that the funeral home, in addition to the ten grand you laid out for the coffin, printing, etc., made an extra $200-$400 SERVICE FEE for ordering your flowers for you? Nope, you would be outraged, be honest.
I usually agree with a lot of what you say Doug, because I believe in free enterprise. I don't believe in deceit. This is not a consumer choice, this is, as Eric so eloquently put it....
Extortion, outwresting, and/or exaction is a criminal offense which occurs when a person unlawfully obtains either money, property or services from a person(s), entity, or institution, through coercion. Refraining from doing harm is sometimes euphemistically called protection. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups.