Personally, I took great offence to this letter.
Take the first sentance. The "many florists who send many wire orders have sent orders to florists who have made it clear they want no incomming wire orders,...)
1. Shouldn't there be a comma between orders and have?
2. I don't recall ever stating that I didn't want a wire order that came from a "real flower shop". Nor do I recall anyone else stating that point either.
We, as a group, must have some people upset. Boo-Hoo!
An unsolisited, Unsigned, un-traceable letter telling us were not going to get what we don't(supposidly) want from a group(?) we don't know is very interesting to say the least.
Given the previous posts from Who Sent Flowers(packing). One would think the letter sent from this "group" would have been one of solisiting shops to fill their orders.
We, who recieved these letters must be special!!!!!!!!!
It is my understanding that one of the recent OGs given the boot was for skimming an estimated 2 million greenbacks. If true, then why criminal charges are not pending is anybodys guess.
Good thing then that this "group" isn't sending us their orders. No need for the rest of us having to deal with CROOKS, ThIEVES, and SCUMBAGS. Especially seeing that for all that money they can't compose a letter who's grammer and composition is no better than mine.
This group of many florists needs a name. For starters-
1. the Gang that couldn't skim right.
2. The Got the Boot Group
3. The Rip-off Raiders
One nice thing about this letter. Who ever "they" are. Won't have our good work to kick arroung anymore.
I always wondered why there are times when someone is unwilling to take credit for good news!