I'm just going to butt in here with an interesting slant ~ a different way of thinking about this.
You may have seen this in Florist's Review in Hot Topic. There were various opinions that were submitted by florists on what they would do if faced with the same "dilemma" that four separate Rhode Island florists faced. All got slapped with a lawsuit for refusing to fill an order for a group called "Freedom From Religion Foundation". The flowers were going to a 16 yr old girl who successfully sued her school to have a banner removed that supported school prayer. I assume it was a congratulatory bouquet for her temerity and victory, the card message was probably what fanned the flames to get these florists to turn the order down. I have no idea if the case against them has been decided.
There was a mixed bag of answers, but one caught me "right" where it hurts and caused me to rethink my answer. One florist answered that she would only turn the order down if the individual was a "creep". I surmise that she would not have a problem with it just because of the affiliation. But....then she went on to add that she "would not want to deliver to the NRA, Tea Party, KKK or any seriously right-wing organization.....".
Hmmm, thought I. Those four florists just might have made a mistake. For not one second have I ever hesitated to refuse an order from an order gatherer OR someone who has been a problem customer. I don't want the headaches involved. But that was based on my own individual experience and not driven by my beliefs. I'm not very fond of the folks who come knocking on my door in pairs and try to shake my religious beliefs but I did a wedding for a couple who are members of that door-knocking "tribe".
My only thought about it is that they may have all been afraid of the affiliation, and repercussions from other customers banning them for doing it. That is a valid fear, even if it isn't really fair. Should or would all of my Christian customers boycott me because I did a wedding for some Jehovah's Witnesses?
Which leads me to my point. Is it right to be going after Tim for doing business? I'm completely against order gatherers in their deceptive practices ~ there ought to be a law....there already is in a hand full of states. But I fully admit that they are way better than I am at many things ~ without using deceit. Those include seeing the big picture about the internet long before I'd ever learned how to email. Hiring Tim was just another savvy move on their part, and Tim was smart enough to take the work where he could find it without letting his personal beliefs get involved.
As for Mikey's incident ~ I can see where the customer is confused. I'm not certain I remember the original story; now that I'm typing I realize I should have gone back and read it again first. When I first read it, I shook my head and fully agreed with Mikey. After reflection on it, I started to wonder. They may never have understood that there was a middle-man involved and I'm not sure that is stupidity. It sounds more like a frazzled customer dealing with an equally frazzled florist and communication may have been the culprit for both sides. Trying to explain the middle-man thing is really slippery and is hard for any sane person to understand. (We florists of course understand it perfectly...
)