Continued from above...
IMO the best resource for selling is a collection of photos of a shop's own work but that takes time and/or money and is generally beyond the reach and skills of new shop owners.
As has been discussed elsewhere at FC, there are options available to purchase non-WS images but IMO none of the alternatives are comprehensive. I crack up when reading rants by various florists about being WS-free and then view their sites filled with with bootleg copies of licensed WS images. It's not uncommon.
My point was that cost should be measured not only in monthly fees but in time, benefit and ancillary resources as well. I'd prefer to give answers that challenge florists to weigh the variables/benefits and understand the underlying premise so they make informed choices.
Coming to FC for opinion from other florists is one thing, careful analysis of a shop's own, real numbers and circumstanced is another.
Quitting or changing a WS is not without some risk - even for a new shop that may have promoted their affiliate brand identity from day one. We made the decision to leave FTD years ago - after careful analysis of the costs/benefits.
I urge others to do the same homework.
I forgot my manners.... Ken and Patty, welcome to FlowerChat. Hope this little discussion has added more light than heat in your quest to assess your WS options.
Of course it's possible to send without a nationally produced selection guide but florists need some kind of visual selling tool - catalog - for reference both for local and out-of-town deliveries. In-store, it helps consumers visualize style, online - it's a must. (Can you imagine a florist's site without pictures of flower arrangements?)Griff said:Many have been operating without selection guides and found no problems in sending orders
IMO the best resource for selling is a collection of photos of a shop's own work but that takes time and/or money and is generally beyond the reach and skills of new shop owners.
As has been discussed elsewhere at FC, there are options available to purchase non-WS images but IMO none of the alternatives are comprehensive. I crack up when reading rants by various florists about being WS-free and then view their sites filled with with bootleg copies of licensed WS images. It's not uncommon.
Yes there is: Tell customers to call the other florists direct - then you'll have zero expenses. (You'll also risks losing future sales to individuals and companies that want one-stop purchasing.)This individual was asking about least expensive SENDING and there isn't more than ONE answer.
My point was that cost should be measured not only in monthly fees but in time, benefit and ancillary resources as well. I'd prefer to give answers that challenge florists to weigh the variables/benefits and understand the underlying premise so they make informed choices.
Coming to FC for opinion from other florists is one thing, careful analysis of a shop's own, real numbers and circumstanced is another.
Quitting or changing a WS is not without some risk - even for a new shop that may have promoted their affiliate brand identity from day one. We made the decision to leave FTD years ago - after careful analysis of the costs/benefits.
I urge others to do the same homework.
I forgot my manners.... Ken and Patty, welcome to FlowerChat. Hope this little discussion has added more light than heat in your quest to assess your WS options.