Professionalism has to still play a part. Proper training has to still play a part. That's why I have been trying to convince Ryan to RE-INSTATE an updated member application questionairre.
And Ricky, I told you last week it was in place
I agree Quality needs to rank over Quantity on this board. Maybe Ryan thinks that as members of FC they can finally learn some things.
Yup quality does need to supersede quantity, but with an eye to bettering the industry. That might mean that we have to take some quality business people and encourage them to brush up on their design skills. Or, take some quality designers and help them to balance their books.
We all have areas to improve - that's why people visit FC in the first place.
Now, "needing improvement" doesn't equal "oh my, that's atrocious, what did you do to that poor flower?!?!" If someone is fumbling the most basic elements of design then FC probably isn't the place for them. Send them to CA to visit Phil's school for a while, and get some common sense edumacated into them
I agree with you, some of the descriptions do not define what I see as a professional florist, but I have also noticed the title description is as free member, this must be applicants in a trial period. I am wondering how many will pay the $100 when the time comes.
You're right - people can sign up, but if they aren't professionals - BBs or "princesses" for example - they likely won't be inclined to pay for membership. FC isn't as pretty or digestible as a trade mag that you can throw on a table to give yourself credibility. I don't imagine FC to be the first place a novice would venture.
I just believe that people should get an education in their chosen field before venturing out. We've all spoken regarding BB's, especially those with no design sense (nor business sense) but there are some very good "home" florists who have had some structure.
I look for websites with pictures of their work (not saying that a WS affiliated site gives much insight into design skills either for applicants) but when I see work that just isn't up to par, it gives me pause. Do I pm them and suggest design school? A study of elements and principles of design because what I've seen is a complete lack of regard for those so important skills?
Yes we all have to start somewhere......you don't become a nurse without learning about structure of medicine... you don't become a secretary (Administrative Assistant now) without typing skills?
I guess, I'm looking for the information we used to get...... business .. how long in business... schooling or apprenticeships....websites...?
I understand pay to play and some perks that come with it but one of the things I did notice before paying membership is those who had no interest apparently in learning didn't return (or just lurked to read) and when I've revisited their websites showing their own designs, nothing had changed there.
Agreed - basic skills are essential. FC isn't Flowers 101, it's where professionals get better.
I get flack all the time and have down right pissed off some people for being honest and saying some designers are better and some way better than others.
I do think though that it is great that so many want to learn and grow...
With that said- I hope they can take the heat when being critiqued. It's hard to hear hard comments about something you made that you think is great.
I applaud anybody who wants to learn more, do better and grow the industry- Just please keep in mind keeping and open mind will help you become a better designer.
Professionals know how to take critique from their peers, when it's given fairly. If the newbs don't like what they here (assuming we present it w/o malice) then they won't come back, won't pay for membership, and we'll have our answer
I haven't looked at any of the photos but just wanna say at least the folks show what they really do.
When someone comes here and drops a link to a canned WS site, we really have NO idea what their work looks like.
At least having a canned WS site means they are a WS member and therefore a real florist, right? Oh, wait ...