Quite frankly I am amazed that any flower shop would accept an order then promptly and publicly trash the individual (sending shop, website, or or order gatherer) that sent them the order.
It's absolutely no wonder that the flower industry is suffering, what impression does this leave with the consumer (both the sender and recipient).
Let's all try to keep in mind that these flowers were originally sent to someone as a gift. They are not your opportunity to make a political statement about your thoughts about the injustices in the flower industry.
If you truly believe in your convictions, simply refuse the order rather than alienating another consumer from purchasing flowers. We have enough ways already to do that as an industry ranging from poor quality product, substitutions, poorly trained operators, and high prices.
As an industry how many times can we shoot ourselves in the foot and still survive.
While I still agree with you here...
Inferno,
Trust me, I would never suggest that you not act as an advocate for your customer first and foremost.....however.
In the case of your fulfilling an incoming wire order is the sending member not actually your customer?
After all, they are the one who originally generated the order and who in turn selected you to fulfill it. They place an order with you, you fill and deliver it, and in turn you are paid for it. Does that not make them the customer in this transaction?
Again I would suggest that if you have principles stick by them and refuse the order rather than accept it and attempt to discredit the sending member in any way, shape or form. The fact remains that as sending members we all place our trust in the fulfilling shop to look after our interests at the point of delivery, not to intentionally undermine the way we do business.
By the way just for the record, I personally consider any flower shop with a website an Order Gatherer. There are simply varying degrees of success.
Let me go over the top here...
If this group of FlowerChatters, or someone else in the industry, doesn't come up with a good solution to this issue, I may just end up like some others here, and give up.
What that means, is that I am going to set up web pages in every city in Canada and the US, and all of them will say "(Insert city here) Florist" and "Flowers by your best (Insert city here) Florist"
Perhaps I could target a few cities very well, and get the top 5 spots on Google and get, maybe 50% of that cities orders, skim off 20% and send the orders to actual shops with less $ than if they would have been in the top 5 for themselves? (And perhaps even become a prominent community member and win awards
oke
The ones that state prominently "flowers delivered by", or "our member florists deliver" are just fine in my opinion. Those sites are in the spirit of the web.
We are really talking about the dOGs here. People in Arkansas have ordered flowers from our site, to be delivered in Arkansas. It says, Winnipeg Florist all over the site. Yes, we are ALL OGs. (No, I am not targeting Arkansas. I know you guys are already searching!
) Maybe there is a Winnipeg in Arkansas, I don't know.
The BS that goes on in the florist business online wouldn't last 5 minutes outside of cyberspace. One day ethics will find their way onto the net, and into this business, but not yet. I have time to wait.
In the mean time, I will complain some, and do as much as I can to get them out of our SERPs.
I put a great deal of time and effort into SEO, using (AFAIK) white hat techniques only (perhaps some controversial Grey hat). It pisses me off to no end when orders are stolen by dOGs. (Beating out the other OGs - failing there is my fault)
_____________________________________________________________
The OG thing out of the way, I am curious about the customer / filler comment. I don't exactly know how it works, so can someone help me follow the money?
Customer - OG - 1800TFTD - Filling Florist ?
or Customer - 1800FTD - Filling Florist ?
Doug does make a good point either way. You are filling the order, per your contract with the WS in this case, not the customer, or the order gatherer.
An interesting new opinion that leaves only one option. Be in the WS on their terms, or out. (I think we have established that they are on their own agenda and won't change their ways)