A point of clarification....
Just because selection guide images are made by 'some of the best designers in the world' (and thanks for the compliment, JB
) the work is driven by the vision of the head of the project - and ultimately, the head of the company.
For the most part, each shot is like filling an order. Designers are given a look and feel, theme, size, price point, color range - and are assigned containers (in certain circumstances). It's very much like filling orders.
I worked on my first TF selection guide in 1985 and was given some very wise words by Rocky Pollitz, the executive producer. She basically said that if she asked us to change, redo, or even scrap a design that it just meant it didn't meet the goal of the shot. Egos were to be checked at the door. We were "her hands" and needed to stay true to each assignment so that the final result - the selection guide - contained the variety of products necessary for successful selling by florists.
I'll never forget the challenge of suppressing a laugh when one of the national celebrity designers said, "well, I know how to make this the right way but I'll do it your way." (No, it wasn't my husband.)
Contemporary work is allowed far more designer discretion - but that's only a small part of any book.
Floralane's point was that the
new shots (pretty much chop and drop roses in 4" cubes) under-utilize the skills of professional shop designers. If your cooler is moving a lot of these JB, then I'm glad they work for you. We do sell the style but mostly find customers generally choosing taller, more impressive offerings at those price points.
Pity that websites don't allow customers to visually compare relative sizes side-by-side. If they did, I believe we'd be seeing a different array of products.