Joe Mioux said:I was beginning to think I was all alone out here with my perennial comments about Cost Accounting.
Thanks Prestonway for the back-up.
Well, we always do cost accounting, with labor as a fixed expense. To us, it gives a better "intuition" as to what's going on. My personal preference.
On the other hand, I am not religious about the question of which accounting methods would be best for florists. I don't think the choice of accounting method matters. I can see how some people prefer using the orthodox accounting using labor as flexible expenditure associated with production.
Regardless of what accounting people choose to use, what really matters, I think, is that people need to understand the meaning of each number they see on their accounting chart. People need to realize that, depending on how to calculate these numbers, what they mean can be quite different.
That's easier said than done, as most accounting calculation is arbitrary. You could increase or decrease your net profit almost as you wish (though some of these creative accounting practices are illegal).
Anyway, here's the bottom line. Numbers are just that, numbers. The meanings of those numbers are more important than the precision of those numbers (yes, numbers do "lie"; look at Enron).