Have you guys been following the recent upheaval in the airline travel industry? It sort of mirrors the OG issue in our business.
American Airlines and Delta have both cut off some 'resellers' (OGs of travel) because the fees charged by companies like Expedia and Travelocity have cut too deeply into the airlines' profits.
American Airlines has developed software they want to force the OGs to use - instead of them providing the traditional data feeds to travel aggregators. American basically wants each consumer/searcher to come into their own 'site' where they can offer timely deals, add-ons and upgrades. They want to control the sale.
In essences, this is how florist-delivered online flower selling should work, too. Florists in delivery locations should be queried for live inventory, prices and delivery fees - instead of being told what to make at a (usually unreasonable) price with products they don't have in stock. 'In the unlikely need of substitution' discalimers by OGs are one of the biggest lies in the biz.
Realistically, how many shops can deliver a design like this or this on short notice?
There's no way a shop in Manhattan, and a store in Tupelo MS and a florist in Anchorage are able to regularly fill and deliver the same orders at the same prices on a same-day or next-day basis. Their costs of overhead, product and delivery will be wildly different - and the retail prices - and menus - offered to LOCAL consumers will definitely reflect that. But not via the WSs and OGs - which just care about the sale - and not about the fulfillment.
IMO consumers are not at all interested in what it costs local florists to accept OG orders.
They ARE interested in getting what they thought they ordered at the best possible price.
But as long as local florists are willing to cough up 35-40% in commissions and fees, the WSs and OGs will continue to run 20% off specials and sell a local florist's flowers cheaper than the shop does to its own customers.
American Airlines and Delta have both cut off some 'resellers' (OGs of travel) because the fees charged by companies like Expedia and Travelocity have cut too deeply into the airlines' profits.
American Airlines has developed software they want to force the OGs to use - instead of them providing the traditional data feeds to travel aggregators. American basically wants each consumer/searcher to come into their own 'site' where they can offer timely deals, add-ons and upgrades. They want to control the sale.
In essences, this is how florist-delivered online flower selling should work, too. Florists in delivery locations should be queried for live inventory, prices and delivery fees - instead of being told what to make at a (usually unreasonable) price with products they don't have in stock. 'In the unlikely need of substitution' discalimers by OGs are one of the biggest lies in the biz.
Realistically, how many shops can deliver a design like this or this on short notice?
There's no way a shop in Manhattan, and a store in Tupelo MS and a florist in Anchorage are able to regularly fill and deliver the same orders at the same prices on a same-day or next-day basis. Their costs of overhead, product and delivery will be wildly different - and the retail prices - and menus - offered to LOCAL consumers will definitely reflect that. But not via the WSs and OGs - which just care about the sale - and not about the fulfillment.
IMO consumers are not at all interested in what it costs local florists to accept OG orders.
They ARE interested in getting what they thought they ordered at the best possible price.
But as long as local florists are willing to cough up 35-40% in commissions and fees, the WSs and OGs will continue to run 20% off specials and sell a local florist's flowers cheaper than the shop does to its own customers.