Because Joe,
The second wire service is redundant. You only need one wire service (Maybe no wire service) to send wire orders out.
Randy, my reason for being FTD is for incoming business.
you're only FTD, yes?
Because Joe,
The second wire service is redundant. You only need one wire service (Maybe no wire service) to send wire orders out.
Because Joe,
The second wire service is redundant. You only need one wire service (Maybe no wire service) to send wire orders out.
Joe spent over $4,500 to receive $7,200 in orders. These orders present no opportunity for repeat business, no investment in building future business.
What Joe could have done instead is spend that same $4,500 on a good marketing plan. Not only would he gain additional sales by doing this, he would be investing in potential new repeat business at 100% sales for the future.
You see, incoming wire orders never result in future 100% sales, but proper marketing is an investment not only for the present but the future as well.
RC
Joe spent over $4,500 to receive $7,200 in orders. These orders present no opportunity for repeat business, no investment in building future business.
What Joe could have done instead is spend that same $4,500 on a good marketing plan. Not only would he gain additional sales by doing this, he would be investing in potential new repeat business at 100% sales for the future.
You see, incoming wire orders never result in future 100% sales, but proper marketing is an investment not only for the present but the future as well.
RC
Joe only thinks he made a profit on those incoming wire orders. Actually his WS Break-even calculator is broke.
Those orders didn't pay for the labor to make the arrangements, or the supportive labor associated with the arrangements, or the drivers who delivered the arrangements, or even the gas in the vans that transported the arrangements.
In fact the small amount of money above his COGs wasn't near enough to contribute anywhere near it's fair share of overhead.
Joe lost money on those orders.
RC
Joe -My Membership costs were $2610. my total revenue (incoming and outgoing revenue - money I received from FTD to fill their orders) was $5415 on 154 incoming orders.
Joe only thinks he made a profit on those incoming wire orders. Actually his WS Break-even calculator is broke.
Those orders didn't pay for the labor to make the arrangements, nor the supportive labor associated with the arrangements, nor the drivers who delivered the arrangements, nor even the gas in the vans that transported the arrangements.
In fact the small amount of money above his COGs wasn't near enough to contribute anywhere near it's fair share of overhead.
Joe lost money on those orders.
RC
Joe -
I so do appreciate your candor, and your openness to discuss this process. When thinking about the numbers earlier today, one thing that struck me was the cost to acquire (buy) each incoming order. Based on those numbers, the cost per order is just shy of $17 (and that figure does not include commissions and receiving fees.)
We ask how WSs afford $10/order rebates for the very top senders, and the answer is that florists are willing to buy the orders for higher costs than the WSs are willing to pay rebates. They make their $ in the difference.
They truly are the ultimate flower order brokers.
But with those costs, I'd ditch my broker.
The thing that also struck me is that I'm not a betting girl, but I bet that there are very, very, very few w/s members paying only $2610 fixed costs! What is working for Joe, probably does not work for the majority.Joe -
I so do appreciate your candor, and your openness to discuss this process. When thinking about the numbers earlier today, one thing that struck me was the cost to acquire (buy) each incoming order. Based on those numbers, the cost per order is just shy of $17 (and that figure does not include commissions and receiving fees.)
We ask how WSs afford $10/order rebates for the very top senders, and the answer is that florists are willing to buy the orders for higher costs than the WSs are willing to pay rebates. They make their $ in the difference.
They truly are the ultimate flower order brokers.
But with those costs, I'd ditch my broker.
Joe,
Basically, you are telling us that being paid over 30% of full value is potentially a profitable order to fill. Any percentage over 30% can go towards your overhead costs.
For example if you receive a $50 incoming wire order as long as you net over $15 you're OK because the remaining money over $15 can contribute to your overhead costs.
Is that what you are saying?
The thing that also struck me is that I'm not a betting girl, but I bet that there are very, very, very few w/s members paying only $2610 fixed costs! What is working for Joe, probably does not work for the majority.
OK Joe,
Substitute candles as an example so we can understand what you are trying to say.
The title of your threat is "WS Break-even calculator", so what's the break-even point?
Joe,yes this is true, but as we can see, being a FTD member is - maybe - just barely profitable for me.
again like the bold text in my very first post, I said I didn't include other costs.
this thread has never really been about the WS business but rather discussing profitable departments and unprofitable departments.
I could have substituted Candles or Greeting Cards in place of WS's.
joe
126 orders is the break even point