Actually there is a set of questions all new applicants are suppose to answer in full.
The problems start when they object to the questions as "nosy" or "uncalled for" or they are "insulted" by the questioning of members etc.
Perhaps in addition to the questions they know they have to answer, there could be a declarative paragraph explaining that current members will be delving into their answers further asking more specifics and verifying the existance of their website, etc.
Many times when we have asked for more details, they have bowed out on their own because their motives for applying maybe haven't been as pure as stated. I am with others who say they prefer membership to be florist store front/studio.
If you have noticed the number of applicants has increased dramatically. Many say they are finding the forum on the internet. While a few say they were referred by current members. Perhaps when a member refers someone they could make sure they confirm that when the applicant post their intro.
This might keep the applicants from attacking V. the way they have been doing. The sheer numbers alone must keep V. covered up.
Thanks V. for all you do!
You're welcome... I LOVE the bolded statement. What a great idea. If an existing member feels strongly about a particular applicant they should stand and be counted.
I have a paragraph I use a great deal when vetting an applicant. I'll brush it up and post it if you like.
Thank you so much for all the kind words. They are much appreciated.
V