Tells me, their losing them faster than they are adding them.
By my records from todays directory update:
FTD: 13876 records, 313 new, 1151 removed (no longer members)
BMT: 6978 records
Tells me, their losing them faster than they are adding them.
Anyone got the Teleflora numbers?
Yea... LOL...it has been mentioned before that the current "plan" is to get to a much smaller number of shops and try and maintain most of the coverage.
I'm confused. Maybe you guys can explain.
First, many of the past strings of posts about FTD alluded to the fact that FTD made money from it's florist side of the business?
If that is true, why would you allow that side of the business to erode?
Wouldn't you want to maintain high membership numbers?
Are the number of flower orders passing thru FTD dropping that fast that they can afford to let membership continue to slip?
Is FTD's direct ship program doing that great that they no longer need florists?
I can't understand how they can let their membership numbers continue to slip like this? I mean all those dollars from monthly fees, all those fees, their cut of the credit card processing, the money made from Mercury, the money made from hosting websites, these are big dollars and by letting florists slip away, they are dollars lost.
To me managment would being trying to grow membership, not let it slip away?
6% is quite a few. However, it has been mentioned before that the current "plan" is to get to a much smaller number of shops and try and maintain most of the coverage. OR, maybe that's not the plan as much as the inevitable.
You've asked the million dollar questions.I'm confused. Maybe you guys can explain.
First, many of the past strings of posts about FTD alluded to the fact that FTD made money from it's florist side of the business?
If that is true, why would you allow that side of the business to erode?
Wouldn't you want to maintain high membership numbers?
Confused sfox... you... I've never known you to be, and I take your reply as a tongue in cheek response (I hope). You are one of the many that has a good grasp of reality!I'm confused. Maybe you guys can explain.
why would you allow that side of the business to erode?
Confused sfox... you... I've never known you to be, and I take your reply as a tongue in cheek response (I hope). You are one of the many that has a good grasp of reality!
Like any other business, they have no control of their "customers" habits. Simple answer.
I am curious though, I wonder if the decline in WS membership somehow relates to the rise in membership of the FlowerChat Nation, based on percentages
Personally I do not think Green will ever find a buyer, unless they have a fire sale. It would have happened by now based on their numbers, but keep in mind, based on the stock out there, that any potential buyer will be funding millions in retirement dollars to the many crooks at the top of the dog pile. I agree, I do not think they wanted to hold FTD this long, it was supposed to be a 2-3 year...get in-gut it-cash out...didn't happen.
And I'd bet **part** of the reason buyers are beware is all the chatter we do on our blogs and elsewhere... Wall Street IS watching...we KNOW that!~
Any clue on the amount of change (plus or minus) with BMT? I'd like to publish a little post about these numbers in the blog.By my records from todays directory update:
FTD: 13876 records, 313 new, 1151 removed (no longer members)
BMT: 6978 records
Confused sfox... you... I've never known you to be, and I take your reply as a tongue in cheek response (I hope). You are one of the many that has a good grasp of reality!
!~