And once again.....yes, I want to hear it all. That is why I continue to respond to you.
Your side is that if the wire service is beneficial to you as a florist financially, then you can justify why a florist might want to be a member. I reread your WS posts and came to this conclusion of your side.
You are partially correct. That's only part of "my side."
Another part of my side is that it's none of my business to tell other florists what they should do in terms of WS membership. If they chose to stay with WS, so be it. If they want to divorce WS, so be it, too.
There are always two layers in WS debate: 1) financial issues and 2) political issues.
The financial issues concern with the profitability of WS membership, those of incoming orders in particular, and have been debated a numerous times in this forum. IMO, it boils down to basically two questions: 1) the number of incoming orders and 2) whether labor is a fixed expense or not.
Complication is that debate of WS membership tends to expand into political issues, such as is it "wrong" (or stupid or whatever) to support the business of our own competitors? This is a political issue, in that reasonable people can have different opinions on that. This is not a issue that we can conclude by number-crunching. And these political aspects of WS debate, too, have been debated numerous times in this forum and, usually, don't get anywhere.
For fun, what is my side?
You tell me your side. And then I will respond.
You say "Unfortunately, the truth can't be polled, because it has nothing to do with the opinion of the majority. Truth and democracy often don't get along." I don't want to poll opinions. I posted a poll to poll numbers and statistics....that's analytical...you should like that.
I will take a look, but remember that these polls are not a random poll in which respondents are selected randomly. Those who aren't interested in your poll or don't like the wording of the poll won't cast their vote. So their statistical/scientific significance is minimal.