You'd fly to Germany but not to Oklahoma? huh, interesting.
The funniest (strange not haha) is hardly anybody from Oklahoma attends those classes.
Look, go there or don't. Belong to TF or don't.
Everyone has the same opportunities (meaning you can go or don't) and we all have from time to time financial struggles.
Shannon,
Yep, believe it ot not, It is cheaper to fly to Europe than it is to fly to Oklahoma.
And I can get a direct flight to Frankfurt, or to Amsterdam.
The airfare system in Canada is strange, I don't dispute that. Plus, when I go to AIFD symposium, I am usually able to see lots of American designers, fewer European designers, and because my shop is modeled after a Dutch style flowershp ... (I'm 1/2 Dutch), there are many reasons for me to go there. Plus in Europe, I feel more at home with the culture than I do in the USA.
Regarding air fares, I guess it is very different here...I'm not sure why, but I often see tickets that are advertized for $299, but when you add on the air transfer fee, the airport tax, the fuel surcharge, the baggage fee, etc, etc, the ticket price can easily be three times the advertised price. When Andrew and I went to Newfoundland, ( about the same distance to Oklahoma) the price of the ticket was advertised as 99$ But by the time we paid for the actual fare, it was over 300.$
Regarding AIFD being held in major US cities, you bet there have been arguments. It may not make the presses, but trust me, many of us have been pointing out the inequities of this for years. It's bad enough for someone like me, but if you hail from a small town in Northern Manitoba, or worse, from some unheard of place in Scotland, or virtually anywhere in New Zealand or Australia, there is no way that the way the system is set up is fair to members. And the new CUE point system is definately skewed against any member who does not hail from the US. These are things that, as members of the "elite" design society, we have been trying to rectify. If more members were willing to be the "pain in the ass" types, instead of the "polite Canadians" perhaps changes would be forthcoming. Or perhaps AIFD would rather keep their organization an insolated American institution that does not welcome the ideas from their European cousins. I do not know the answer to that dilema. But I do continue to voice my concerns, along with many other international members.
Regarding the cost of symposium education, I must disagree there. To attend all of the shows, it costs around 500$ US.That does sound like alot, but considering every meal, every moment of your time is spent at some sort of learning opportunity, I think that the cost is more than reasonable. You are bombarded with learning opportunities from 8 AM to midnight, for each day you are there, so the fee, divided by the number of hours you atend is actually quite reasonable, compared to other shows that last, at best 3 hours.
I'm not in favour of only holding symposii in major US cities, but I cannot fault the financial value of the experience.
Oh, and just like the TF classes, you do not have to be a member of AIFD to attend.
As I said before, when it comes to TF, I just think that if you are going to tout yourself as a North American organization, and collect fees from members across North America, it only is fair to offer the same benefits to Canada as you do to the US. After all, we pay the same dues too. I'm not suggesting that I do not value being a member of TF...I am one of those who does find it to be a mutually positive experience in many ways. But when it comes to the equitable availability of educational opportunities, I feel that the scales definitely fall to the US members, which I do not feel is fair, or just.
JP
JP