Joe Mioux said:
Griff:
Sitting in front of computer and reading complaints about WS doesn't make the information conveyed in one's post accurate.
There is a difference between accuracy and truthfulness.
I have several times brought up annectodal evidence regarding my business and you nor anyone else have responded to those comments.
I receive far more incoming WS orders from regular flower shops than I do OG's. The florists that are in my community never bring up your issue that OG's ruining the floral business.
I am just basing my comments on my real business life experiences and hopefully providing some balance to your and others position.
Joe
Joe, I've been reading these boards for over 5 years now and as I have said before I was a member of either FTD, TF or AFS at one time or another in the first 14 years of my business. I have never based any of my comments or conclusions on the postings of florists just venting. When several florists post that they have invested in an Eagle system and they can't get out of a lease or the WS is not going to allow them transfer their CC business to an outside vendor, I accept that as fact. If florists are openly talking about the various platforms that each Ws computer system operates on and these platforms are incompatable with each other, then that means that they can't talk to each other. If they can't communicate with other florists unless they are operating within the same system, then those same florists are "trapped" within that system. Their sending system will not operate outside the WS environment. The data base quarterly upgrades have to be provided first from the WS and then in the format to work with even the independent's hardware. There are several other things that make it impossible for a large number of florists to ever leave the WS. This is fact and not speculation. At the same time, the smaller florists are not trapped because their volumn of wire business or investment in equipment is minimal. Hense we spend alot more time talking to smaller florists.
As I have said before, if you feel that your numbers support you staying with your wire services, that's fine. But I also don't consider your numbers to be consistant with most florists. When I left the WS, I was averaging about 30 orders out a month. Florists in larger towns just 15 miles East of here were sending 60 and 70 orders out per month. I disagree with your appoach to "bundle" all the expenses connected with the WS orders and conclude that the actual cost is only 17 percent. You math might be correct, but the number doesn't tell you much. Is 17% a good number or is too high or too low. There is no reference. For example, if my total advertising expense for my business is supposed to be 10%, then isn't 17% too high for only 10% of your total business. Wire ins and outs are two completely different categories and the values should be kept separately and the respective costs of each should be accounted for separately. Afterall, based on your method, the end percent will vary considerably based on the actual volumn of outgoing vs incoming.
As florists are located further and further away from major metropolitan areas, it is not surprising the less concern that florists will have about OG's and OGing. However, OGing is about taking a full value order from one florist and turning it into a discounted order for another florist. Joe, you and your florists should also be concerned. In my little town I may have as many as 6 or 7 OG's when we do a internet search as well as the various OG's listed in our phone book. May I remind you that the vast majority of these OG are REAL FLORISTS that have adopted this marketing approach. Those real florists are going to send you florist to florist orders. Even in your town of Carlyle and Breese, you are not immuned. Local search shows two florists NOT in your area. One is Krupp Florist which is easily 25 miles away and Blossom Florists whose website states that they have been serving the Carlyle and Breese and surrounding area for 30 years. NO ADDRESS OR NO LOCATION. These florists are OGING! Take just 2 orders a week out of your area and then feed them back as wire ins and that's a loss of over $1400 annually in sales. And you only have two OG's. I have 6 or 7 and the florists East of here may have 10 or 12. The numbers grow as you get closer to the major population centers and the loss in sales is much greater when you play with larger numbers of orders converted.
TODAY no florist has any way of knowing for certain whether the order they receive was sent to them routinely from a real florist, a pure OG or an OG real florist. The WS have even helped some of their membership create some of these florist OG websites as they know it helps the WS business. Now, Joe before you jump up an down and say that is innuendo or just assumption on my part, the answer is NO! I have spent considerable time looking at many of the REAL FLORISTS OG's and a good portion are WS timplates that have been modified to remove the specific local information and list only an 800 number. That's not by accident.
Now, Joe, I have no way of knowing whether you are OGing or not, but some of the people that you have been standing next to are! Their agendas are completely geared to convincing florists that filling orders is good and rejecting is bad. Afterall, it is only a couple of orders and your designer doesn't have anything to do right know anyway. - right? Continuing to provide the pathway for florists to convert full value local business into discounted business is a cancer and it is slowing eating away florists. Twenty- eight thousand + down to roughly 22,000. If that is not being attacked by a disease, then what would you like to call it?