First off, I don't for a moment believe that a comparison between your decision to purchase Starbucks and a consumers choice as to where to buy roses is a fair one.
Lets face it coffee is an everyday purchase and roses are not, secondly if there is a product more subject to a consumers personal tastes than coffee I don't know what it is, thirdly buying coffee at Starbucks is an experience for many rather than simply a cup of coffee, and last but not least as I recall Starbucks is floundering financially and closing stores while Mcdonalds is doing just fine (sound like another retail industry we all know)
As for your belief that $12.99 roses are "crap" this could not be further from the truth. I have personally been present at some of the best quality importers in Miami and watched them load product onto Krogers trailers, the same quality product that they sell to wholesalers and retailers. Sure they are not 60-70 cm stem lengths, but they are quality roses.While a company like Krogers or Costco may pay a bit less than "mom & pop" for these roses what makes them $12.99 roses is not the cost to the retailer, but the actual markup the retailer puts on the product.
As for how supermarkets treat product, don't judge them all by your limited experience. I have been to produce trade shows and the majors flowers farms all have a large presence along with virtually every post harvest care product manufacturer. The reality is that in the major food chains most understand and practice post harvest care better than the average florist, a lot of times their flower suppliers ensure it as the product is often on consignment and either way a supplier is judged by the longevity of the product and customer complaints.
Unfortunately the many retail florists views post harvest care as an added expense in both labor and product hard costs so try to cut corners where possible. I baAfter se this opinion on being in the wholesale side of the trade for 15 years and watching retailers consistently purchase post harvest care products based on which was cheapest, not which was best suited for the task at hand. What did you say about cheap, ahhh yes "cheap=crap".
On a last note while you ( and many others) may feel confident that the people who shop in your store are not looking for $12.99 roses, tell me this. Do these same people purchase their groceries at Costco or Walmart?
The bottom line is that making assumptions about what consumers want and forcing your desires on them want is a sure way to go broke.
After reading your reply Doug, it seems all doom for the retail florist. If price is the deciding factor then florists have no chance. The only expenses that a florist has real control over is payroll. If that payroll expense is at the industry average of 30% then even if a florists removes all labor from the price of what they charge currently for a price dozen roses it still will not equal what is being charged at mass market outlets.
Competing on price alone is not the answer. Other factors have to come into play. And using the present as the model for running your business is wrong. This economy is not the norm.