That's the way I see it, too.
We have had a very diverse group of registered users for as long as I can remember. At least a few log in here nearly every day but never post. Some work for WSs and one is a famous dOG of the lowest order.
They want to know what's being said about themselves. I'm glad they can read it here.
Different folks want to draw different circles around their own definitions of what a 'real florist' is.
Shall we keep out all people who've bought a store while having zero industry experience?
How about all FC members who aggressively order gather?
Both would be stupid lines in the sand AFAIC.
I loved Eric sharing about how Linh got her now very successful business started from home. She STOLE no one's business and was a successful designer in her own right because she provided professional quality and service.
As far as the demise of Floristboard goes... with no accountablility for what was said, posts were allowed to be mean, dismissive, taunting and rude. We've been made fun of here at FC for being 'too kind' but that's OK with me.
I keep hoping for a month where the Marketing or Website Development forums are more popular than the one about WSs.
One of the posters mentioned she heard about FC from J's show. Are we supposed to ask him NOT to mention us for fear a hobbyist might log in? That too would be a shame!
Once again, I suggest we define FC by the scope of our discussions and not by some litmus test or sorority-by-invitation-only scheme.
Yes, opinions do vary.
Once again, I suggest we define FC by the scope of our discussions and not by some litmus test or sorority-by-invitation-only scheme.
Local competition? Look at the contributions of Eric, Ted, Rich and myself. We have overlapping service areas and our marketing is directed to many of the very same consumers. Heck, Ted and I have B&Ms within a couple miles of each other. I don't think that's held us back from sharing our knowledge. I wish more, not less, locals would come to FC.Another person I spoke to today told me she won't post here much because there are now too many of her local competitors here. Others (plural) have told me it has become a waste of time. We're losing that edge that we elite few used to enjoy.
There are some varieties of flowers that require unique processing - and even the gurus at the top don't always agree as to best practices for everyday products like roses so those questions could come from anybody.We're now being asked questions like "how do I process the flowers? How do I chose the colors? How do I advertise my competition with real full time florists better?" regularly.
And I think that's the primary crux of displeasure - and includes not just home-based florists but industry members who speak rudely to their peers. Overall, the community has done a good job of dealing with disresepctful members over the years.I never came on to a board of my peers or an organzation of my peers and had an attitude, or threatened them, or was , well a snot.
This exact thing came to me directly yesterday.I suppose, in part, it's about differing values and philosophies.
In two words... not so!Go for it. Sounds like it's a done deal anyway. The tone of the supportive posts and the e-mail that I received yesterday have more than convinced me that this string and poll is just a smokescreen to justify what the "majority" of "tenures" has already decided.
I predict you'll be quite successful at creating even more lack of unity and devisiveness in a dying industry which desperately needs a unifying presence which is supportive of all who are willing to be a part of it if it is to survive.
In two words... not so!
Darn it...I don't like that poll much. LOL. I helped Mom and Dad build our first flowershop when I was 15. At that time I held the esteemed positions of delivery boy and water boy. Then I drifted off into the truly dull world of accounting.
I have never really been a florist - and I am still not a florist. I know florists, I like florists, I like flowers, I have three shops. I'm a darn good beancounter. I have personally spoken to Gaylon Pyle. I buy a lot of the flowers for my sister. But honestly, I barely know an Alsto from my Ahole.
Are you going to give the "BOOT TOO"?
It's kind of odd, I like it here, and feel like a have made good friends here. I have tried to contribute on the few areas where I have some expertise. It seems funny to think, that I am not qualified.
Where do I fit in?
All the best,
Hope you're right and I'm wrong.
Guess time and what's already apparently been done to start things in that direction will tell as they emerge from the smoke and become known to the real majority.
I think the real question on this string, is not the us against them idea. It's not about tenure. It about what kind of information do you want to be posted here.
If you want this board to be an open forum for real brick and mortar florists who face similar problems and have to create similar solutions, then keep the hobbists out. If you wish to have a forum that babbles about items that are beggining level and that you have nothing to gain from, then open it to everyone, heck even consumers.
The result of each decision will be markedly different.
NOW, are these "back slapping" Black Hats, or are these Black Hats smokin something funny??
We have reached another "plateau" here at FlowerChat, where perseptualization has become fact, in some peoples' eyes....putting a worm on a hook, WON'T always catch you a fish, and making a conceptual accusation WON'T prove that there is a diversionary fire built just to make smoke!!
AGAIN....
It ain't so.......
Was there an original purpose, goal or definition in the creation of 'Flower Chat' that was available to all in writing? Has that changed or evolved - in writing so that all may understand the purpose and direction of this group? The answers to these questions may help to provide answers for members questions. Perhaps clarity here by reference to earliest posts would be helpful.